Wednesday, June 28, 2006

I think its time for a few thoughts on the sport of the last few weeks and the next couple of months:

Football

- The great thing about watching Ronaldo is that it gives all the fat boys like us eternal hope right? The scary thing about it all is how HD TV replays show that pait wobbling up and down – so is that we I look like when I’m scoring all my goals?

- So far, I’ve got my wall-chart spot on, except that I had Holland-England for Saturday and not Portugal. I still reckon that we’ll fluke it against Scolari and then we’ll have a Brazil-England clash just before the ‘Umdat’l-Fiqh class next Wednesday. And yes, anyone who wants to watch the 2nd half at my house until 35 minutes – can.

- What is it that I can’t see in Torres? Please tell me that we’re not going to waste £20 million on him.

- What a wonderful game between France and Spain, spoiled only by Henry’s cheating. The biggest baistee is that I recently told a friend that Henry, Larsen, Zidane et al were my favourite footballers because they never faked fouls and they always play like men. I think I'll shut up right about now.

- Argentina are still going to win this I reckon. Their bench is just too scary, forget about the eleven on the pitch! And someone please find me some good quality gossip that we’re going to sign that Tevez; don’t worry son, we got over Stevie Bruce, and we’re doing our best with Rooney – we can make you a stud as well…

- Isn’t Motson just so rubbish? If it wasn’t for Adrian Chiles, Lineker, Wrighty, Hansen and the stud of all studs Leonardo, the BBC would be flat on its face in this World Cup. Five Live is excellent as usual, although Alan Green has got to sort out his vendetta against Beckham. ITV is absolutely lamentable; their teams are just rubbish, despite nicking Steve Ryder from the Beeb, although Clive Tyldesley has been the better TV Commentator.

- There’s been plenty to laugh at during the games, my favourite being the shot of the three players sent off during Portugal-Holland having a little moan at the game from the sidelines like naughty children in detention. Also, is it only me who (shamefully I admit) finds those dratted Yankees so insanely funny on the Budweiser ads after each game?

- I could go on about the game for ages, but I end with this: the world and certainly myself has never witnessed a greater footballer than Zinedine Zidane. Discuss.


Tennis

Well this is easy enough. Congratulations Roger; shame about your football team though mate.

And the women? Don’t know, not meant to be watching that remember?


Rugby

Nothing but continual baistee for England. I’m looking for a new team to support outside of the Wallabies – might try Wales considering I work there so much…


Cricket

- How comes England have become so rubbish?

- Why can’t India beat the lame West Indies? I hope I don’t have to eat my words when we (with my Pak cap on now) meet them later on this year…

- What is the best Pak eleven to play against the Pommies, despite how rubbish they’ve suddenly come? Losing Shoaib was a massive blow, but to lose Rana Naved Hasan is much more serious – he’s easily the best bowler we have at the moment. I can’t believe that left Arshad Khan at home either; his off-spin is of the highest variety but I suppose they reckon that its wiser to go with Shoaib Malik and his batting. And we all want Mushy back, just for old times sake…

- Therefore, I reckon it should be: Salman Butt, Shoaib Malik, Younis Khan, Mohammad Yusuf, Inzamam, Kamran Akmal, Shahid Afridi, Abdul Razzaq, Mohammad Asif, Umar Gul, Danish Kaneria (with Rana replacing Umar if he’s fit, and Shoaib Akhtar replacing Kaneria on a seamer; Mushtaq gets a game if Kaneria is not bowling well). Discuss.

That’s enough lahw for a week me thinks…

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

It is a sign of the times that those who have no qualifications whatsoever act as spokesmen on issues of Islamic fiqh and belief; the current rather boring furore over music as I understand it involves one established singer, one "Islamic" singer, a journalist/celebrity/presenter/come-what-may, a comedian, 20,000 concert goers, a couple of hundred thousand angry young men and women and exactly zero scholars of any worth with any evidence of a tahqiqi position.

That's fiqh 21st Century style.

Anyway, stay away from such stuff that'll only waste your time. If you want to see the position of Ahlus-Sunnah and hundreds of thousands of their 'ulema throughout the last 1400 years bar a few that you can count on your hands, pick up any classical fiqh text from any of the four main madhabs and any of the other subsidiary ones, and you'll find the evidences for why modern day music is not Islamically permissible.

But if you like being the weirdo odd-one out, fancy a bit of fatwa-shopping, and like to have those things made permissible that either will bring you a financial, fame, celebrity or just plain entertainment benefit, then let me direct you to one of the 'Ulema who has written a detailed bahth on the issue and passed music as permissible with certain conditions in the only detailed scholarly study of its kind. You can have a rare opportunity in meeting the Shaykh himself here:



And yes I know he's one my teachers, but hey, it's a good thing that we study with more than one person and it's an even better thing that the Shaykh can take a joke as I like to remind him every once in a while.

Now, where's that Mozart CD again...

Saturday, June 24, 2006

There’s been a lot of interest in the approaching “Muslim Family Fun Day” at Alton Towers on Sunday, September 17th 2006.

Some couldn’t believe it to be possible, others rubbished the idea, and some well-intentioned chaps even believed it to be some kind of hoax.

I’d like to make it very clear that I have spoken to those running Islamic Leisure and this event is 100% booked and going ahead. And it should be fantastic.

I can vouch for the team personally, some of whom I met before abroad studying Arabic; there was indeed some confusion at the Alton Towers end due to a mix-up between their call centres which led people to believe that there was no booking. Not only has that been cleared up but a link to Islamic Leisure should be going up on the Alton Towers website sometime next week. And no, the website is not a scam, and no it isn't an attempt to get your private details and yes, it is totally secure to book online.

Sigh. Will Muslims ever cease being the perennial Conspiracy Theorists?

No doubt, this is something unprecedented for our Muslim community and even more so as we try to unite and strengthen our ranks based upon that which we all agree – which is an awful lot incidentally, especially in these difficult and strained times.

This whole project has taken a lot of planning and huge investment of money and resources. It has apparently only been previously achieved by a few mega-corporate companies such as Sky Television and British Telecom; it’d be so nice if the Muslims were able to show the kind of will and organisation that is required to do things on a large scale in a successful way.

I also believe that there is a discount on early bookings so those with big families (which basically means all us Paks) will need to get in there early.

In any case, if I’m in the UK at the time then I shall definitely be there God willing. It should be a great day out for the family, with plenty of bakwas for the kids to do and even more bakwas for us to do which should nicely leave all the women together to chat their bakwas that they normally do.

Ay na’m.

;-)

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

An interesting, long read but well worth it, from Esquire Magazine (with thanks to Qazi Saab)

Innocent
The State of the American Man

By Tom Junod

Can America and Islam coexist? The answer may lie with the fate of
twenty-five-year-old "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh. The prison
profile of the man who now calls himself Hamza.

Arabic must be one hell of a language. It must indeed be preeminent among
all languages on earth, because it is the language of revelation in Islam.
It is not only the language that the Prophet, peace be upon him and his
family, spoke to all of humankind; it is the language that God spoke to
the Prophet. It is the language that God chose to make His wishes for
humankind known. In Islam, there are none of the bewildering textual
controversies that have beset Judaism and Christianity; in Islam, there
are no authors with competing claims. There is only one God, giving one
specifically Arabic Koran to his final Prophet. Let other religions divide
themselves with their warring tongues, their disjointed canons. In the
singular Arabic of the singular Koran, humankind has found its answer to
Babel.

And so it is that the Holy Koran cannot exist in translation. There are
many translations of the Koran, but they are not the true Koran itself,
for it is only the Arabic that transforms God's repetitive instructions
and injunctions and warnings and threats—and his repetitive hatred of the
infidel—into a miraculous song impervious to every challenge.

And so it is that every Muslim must try to master Arabic. It is not
necessary that every Muslim succeed in his effort, for God made every man
with different capabilities. But it is necessary for every man to try,
once he becomes a Muslim. The effort is his obligation, his fard. God is
merciful, wise.

And so it is that when a sixteen-year-old American named John Walker Lindh
converts to Islam in 1997, he begins calling himself Suleyman al-Faris and
sets about trying to master the language of the Prophet, peace be upon
him.

And so it is that Suleyman travels alone from California to Yemen when he
is seventeen years old and attends an Arabic language school. Two years
later, he goes again, this time with the intention of absorbing not only
the singular language of Arabic but also what he hopes will be a singular
Islamic culture. He does not find singularity in Yemen, and so he tries
finding it in a madrassa—an Islamic school—in Pakistan, and then a
military training camp in Afghanistan.

And so it is that for months, Suleyman speaks almost nothing but Arabic in
the mountains of Afghanistan, for Muslims come to Afghanistan from all
over the world, seeking to fulfill their religious obligations by engaging
in jihad—by taking up the cause of Afghans fighting to maintain a pure
Islamic state. The Afghans he is fighting for are called the Taliban, and
speak their own language, Pashto. The Muslims who come in their cause
speak Arabic and go to the front lines in the Afghan civil war as Al
Ansar—the Arabic term for "the helpers." By the time Suleyman reaches the
front on September 6, 2001, carrying his rifle and his grenades, he is
just twenty years old and already fluent in the one language of the one
God. He is a prodigy waiting to become a saint.

And so it is that after September 11, when the Americans come to
Afghanistan with their planes and their bombs, and they capture Suleyman
and put him in front of a camera, he speaks his English with a slight
Arabic accent, and millions of people in America and all over the world
believe they hear the mottled tongue of treason.

And so it is that when an American dies in the battle that led to his
capture, Suleyman is accused of conspiring to kill him. And so it is that
now he is imprisoned in America for twenty years, and part of his sentence
is that America will not allow him to speak Arabic. He cannot teach; he
cannot even pray with an open mouth. It is forbidden. And yet the brothers
in the prison speak Arabic to him, because they know he is learned,
patient—a serious scholar. He doesn't call himself Suleyman anymore, but
he hasn't gone back to calling himself John, either. He calls himself
Hamza, after the uncle of Muhammad, peace be upon him. He is Hamza Walker
Lindh, still caught between the language of the Islamic imperium and the
language of the American empire. And one day in late 2003, when he is on
line for chow and one of the brothers says to him, "Assalamu alaikum," he
has a decision to make. Assalamu alaikum is the traditioal Muslim
greeting. It means "Peace be upon you," and when a Muslim hears it, it is
customary for him to respond not only in kind but in excess of the
original greeting—in slightly more effusive language. But the language is
Arabic. And Hamza is standing within earshot of a guard. And he, with his
pinioned tongue, knows that to speak is to be punished. And he has to
choose, as he has always had to choose. And his choice has always been one
choice, as his God has always been one God.

And so it is that Hamza speaks.

He is a better person than you or I. He has gone away, but his story
hasn't, because his story is about something no prison can extinguish.
Even in prison, he has a glow, a light on his face. He has a spiritual
presence. His list of don'ts stretches further than your list of dos, and
his list of dos keeps him occupied in the vast chronological wasteland of
prison. He's very kind. He has no anger, no dark testosteronal currents.
He has a sad story to tell, but he doesn't tell it as a sad story. He is
not bitter. He's funny, in fact. His father, on the lecture circuit now,
says that when he visits his son in prison, they sit for five and six
hours at a time, talking, laughing. The guards look at them. Not that he's
flippant, a wiseguy. He's very, very serious. He's very concerned about
the poor—so concerned that he's lived among them. He's committed to social
justice, though he's the first to admit that he's made some bad decisions
in that regard. But that's another thing about him. He never lies. He
never changes his story, even when he has every reason to. He's very
consistent, to put it mildly.

If you happen to be a Muslim: Well, he's a better Muslim than you are,
too. If you want to know him—why he did what he did, why he does what he
does—all you have to do is open the Koran and read. It's all there. In
Islam, more than in Christianity or Judaism, perfection is a possibility,
and that's what he strives for. Islam has no apparatus for the official
recognition of saints, but it has a word, waliyy, that means in the Arabic
"one of God's special slaves." Well, that's him. When he went to Yemen in
2000—the trip that took him to Pakistan and Afghanistan and back to
America in shackles—he went to memorize the Koran. He got a quarter of the
way through before he was captured on December 1, 2001. He finished at the
federal prison in Victorville, California, where he lives now. In the
Muslim world, that's not only an honor to him; it's an honor to his entire
family.

But then: Maybe you're not a Muslim. Maybe you're just an...American, and
you don't particularly care if John Walker Lindh is waliyy or not. You
don't particularly care if he's a better Muslim or even a better person,
because neither of those things makes him a better American. Even if he
didn't do what the government originally said he did, he did something,
and what he did was put Islam first. Islam is the Arabic word for
"submission," and John Walker Lindh submitted. He was free to do so, of
course, because he was an American. But his freedom to practice any
religion he wanted eventually put him in the service of a cause that had
nothing to do with freedom. His search for purity within himself
eventually led him to search for a pure Islamic state—and to serve the
comprehensively oppressive Taliban. And now he is supposed to be pure in
thought and in word and in deed. Well, that purity is what makes him
problematic to Americans, because it's Muslim purity, and Muslim purity
and American freedom seem to be on a collision course. Indeed, they have
already collided in the person of John Walker Lindh, and American freedom
was the worse for it, while Muslim purity found its perfect, silent
spokesman.

Hamza does not have to speak. He does not have to answer the brother's
greeting, even after the brother says, "Assalamu alaikum" on the chow
line. It is not an obligation. Oh, sure, he knows what is customary among
Muslims. There is no one at the federal medium-security prison in
Victorville who knows better. He has made a study of proper Islamic
etiquette, as he has made a study of most things relating to the Prophet,
peace be upon him. The way Hamza shakes hands—with a lingering refusal to
be the first to break the clasp—is the Muslim way. So is the way he
engages his teachers. "In the Islamic spirit of learning, there is an
elaborate etiquette to be followed," says Shakeel Syed, an imam from Los
Angeles who served as a contract chaplain at Victorville through the
summer of 2005. "If your teacher is wrong, and you know he is wrong, there
is no public correction. There is only public praise. And even in private,
criticism is implied and inferred. And even after all that, it is
customary for the student to say, 'God knows best—maybe both of us are
wrong.' Well, that's Hamza. He has the kind of knowledge you don't get
from Islam 101 books. We used to have circle discussions after Friday
prayers. And in one of the historical stories I mentioned, I referred to a
person as a cousin of Muhammad. Hamza waited till everyone left. Then he
said, very politely: 'You might want to double-check that. You may very
well be right, but you might want to check—and I'll check, too.' There's
nothing he does that's not in the Islamic spirit."

And yet, because Hamza knows his etiquette, he knows it would not be a
violation of etiquette to stay silent after the brother's greeting, for
God is generous, forgiving. Indeed, God says that He has given his Koran
to the faithful to make life easier for them, not harder. God calls Islam
the middle way, not only the straight path but the path of moderation. He
allows many exemptions from the practice of faith if the practice of faith
puts the faithful in peril. He even allows the faithful to disavow their
faith, so long as their hearts stay true. And surely Hamza faces peril
from the practice of his faith and the expression, in Arabic, of his true
heart.

He was in chains, after all, when he returned from Afghanistan to America
on January 23, 2002. He faced spending the rest of his life in prison
after a federal grand jury returned charges two weeks later that he had
conspired to kill Americans and had lent "material support" to Al Qaeda.
Even after the Justice Department offered a plea bargain in July 2002 and
dropped eight of the ten charges against him, even after prosecutors
finally admitted that there was no evidence that he had joined Al Qaeda or
threatened to kill Americans, even after he wound up pleading guilty only
to carrying a rifle and grenades for the Taliban, the government and its
negotiator, Michael Chertoff, made his silence a condition of the plea.
And so, although it dropped all charges against the defendant relating to
terrorism, the administration would continue to treat the defendant as a
terrorist through the course of his incarceration by imposing what is
known by statute as special administrative measures and by common parlance
simply as a gag order. He would not spend his life in jail. He would
spend, instead, twenty years in jail, and during that time not only would
he be unable to have any visitors but his attorneys and his father and his
mother and his brother and his sister and his grandmother; not only would
his visitors be forbidden to relate to the public anything he said or
thought; not only would the FBI have to read and clear any letter he sent
or received and the government reserve the right to bug his conversations
with his cellmates and monitor his phone calls. No, he would also have to
abide by the following provision of the SAM: "All communications with
others will be in English."

He is, by virtue of the strictures on his speech, regarded as a political
prisoner inside prison walls. And so surely the brother who greets him
would forgive Hamza his silence. Surely Hamza could just mouth the proper
Arabic words, or speak them under his breath, or whisper them so quietly
that no guard could hear him. Surely God would forgive such an exercise in
discretion....

"Walaikum assalam," Hamza says, loud enough for the brother—and the
guard—to hear.

Maybe the guard is new, and zealous. Maybe Hamza knows the guard is new
and zealous and wants to be zealous in return. For, as Shakeel Syed says,
"he has an option to lead a normal Muslim prison life. Instead, he chooses
to defy every norm the prison is used to—both the administration and the
inmates." And so the zealous guard reports that zealous prisoner 45426-083
has spoken words in the forbidden tongue. And when prisoner 45426-083
returns to his cell, he is ordered to back up to the feeding slot in his
cell door. He is handcuffed through the slot and led away to the Special
Housing Unit—also known as the SHU, also known as the hole. There he has
to strip naked and is searched under his testicles and in the cavity of
his ass. And there Hamza settles into his cell, with the Arabic singing in
his head, where no one can stop it.

He was the first.

The first American to get Abu-Ghraibed, long before Americans knew they
were capable of such an exotic verb. The first to inspire Donald Rumsfeld
to issue the order "Take the gloves off," and the first to be on the
order's receiving end. The first to be denied medical treatment, the first
photographed naked and bound, the first taunted while blindfolded, the
first—certainly the first—to have SHITHEAD scrawled on his blindfold, the
first whose digital photos made their way round the world as souvenirs,
the first denied access to the Red Cross, the first to be ushered into a
legal limbo created ex nihilo by the administration's notions of executive
power. He served as a test case for an administration eager to see what it
could get away with, and what it tried to get away with was, well, this:
His father hired him a lawyer as soon as he saw his son on MSNBC. The
lawyer immediately wrote to John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell,
and George Tenet and informed them that John Walker Lindh had counsel, and
counsel was ready to fly to Afghanistan to meet him. They did not write
him back, but John Ashcroft did not believe he was obliged to. He operated
on the theory that John Walker Lindh had a lawyer only if he, not his
father, hired one, even though at the time John Walker Lindh was
blindfolded and duct-taped naked to a stretcher in Afghanistan. He was
being held in a shipping container, and he had a bullet in his thigh, and
by the time an FBI agent interrogated him, the bullet had been in his
thigh for nearly two weeks and the wound was starting to stink. "Of
course, there are no lawyers here," the agent told him, and two days after
he gave his statement, he was moved to a ship in the Arabian Sea and the
bullet was finally extracted.

The treatment John Walker Lindh received while in American hands is not
only an affront to conscience. It manages to make someone described by
everyone who knows him as "singular" and "one of a kind" somehow
representative of betrayed American innocence, and that indeed is how
Frank Lindh characterizes him when he talks about him in public. When John
Walker Lindh was being reviled as a traitor, Frank Lindh was being reviled
for allowing him to become one. When no less successful a parent than
George Herbert Walker Bush was lampooning John Walker Lindh for being a
"misguided Marin County hot-tubber," Frank Lindh was being lampooned for
actually raising his son in a place like Marin County, and then for
divorcing his wife, Marilyn Walker, and living with a man. And when, after
his sentencing, John Walker Lindh began his imposed silence, Frank Lindh
began an elective one, along with the rest of his family. Now, though,
John Walker Lindh's lawyers have petitioned the administration to commute
his sentence. Yaser Hamdi—the other American citizen who was taken
prisoner alongside John Walker Lindh during the rout of the Taliban and
was in the same place at the same time doing the same things—has, after
spending three years in a Navy brig without being charged with any crime,
been sent home to Saudi Arabia, where he was raised. And Frank Lindh, a
lawyer himself, has sensed an opportunity not only to press his son's case
but also to tell his son's story the way he sees it—the way he has always
seen it, even when his son was extolling the virtues of martyrdom on CNN.

It has always been difficult for John Walker Lindh's parents to reconcile
the classically American innocence and idealism they perceive in their son
with the extremism of his eventual actions and allegiances. And to the
extent that Frank Lindh does it, while speaking one April evening on the
stage of a private school in Oakland, he does it by characterizing John
Walker Lindh as extremely innocent, extremely idealistic, and, above all,
extremely American. A teenager who found God, or, as his family thought of
it, his passion. A seventeen-year-old who travels with his father to
Ireland in full Islamic dress and wins over the local Catholics with the
simplicity and fervor of his love for God. A nineteen-year-old who is bold
and brave enough to say goodbye to his weeping family and travel for the
second time on his own to Yemen in search of the true Arabic. A
twenty-year-old who in late April 2001 e-mails his parents from an
Internet café in Pakistan with a request for permission to go into the
mountains for the summer—and neglects to mention that he means the
mountains of Afghanistan. A young trainee who believes he has chosen the
right side in the civil war between the mujahideen of the Taliban and the
corrupt warlords of the Northern Alliance. A dedicated student who knows
after meeting Osama bin Laden in the summer of 2001 that bin Laden is not
a serious scholar—and who falls asleep during bin Laden's speeches. A
green soldier who does sentry duty at the front lines and never fires his
gun. A homesick American who like all Americans dreams of coming home for
Christmas...until, that is, America comes for him. And not the America he
knew, not the America he left just a year earlier—an America changed by
9/11 and determined to show the world that the innocent empire that might
have forgiven someone like John Walker Lindh is gone forever.

It is an American story, all right. It is so American that Frank Lindh, in
his trimmed beard and his gray suit, sometimes seems to be offering his
own innocence—at once wounded and breathless—as proof of his son's. When
he gave his permission to John to travel into the mountains in the spring
of 2001, he wrote in an e-mail, "I trust your judgment and hope you have a
wonderful adventure." After all that has happened since Frank wrote those
words, he still lives by them. He still trusts and he still hopes. He
still has such complete faith in his son that he has become a kind of
fundamentalist on his son's behalf—a fundamentalist who discounts his
son's own fundamentalism. In Frank's recounting, John Walker Lindh is not
a religious figure but rather a romantic one, whose e-mails from his
travels "are still a delight to read, full of wonderful observations and
wry comments," and who while abroad "met a lot of interesting people" from
places like Indonesia and Chechnya. "John's views are very much those of a
mainstream Muslim," he says, in answer to a question. "He's not an
extremist in any sense." Never, in the hour and a half he's onstage, does
he acknowledge that the interesting people John met were, like John,
perfectly willing to die in defense of Islam. Never does he suggest that
it's John's very talent for extremity of faith and feeling that has
sustained him through his trials and sustains him still. And never does he
call John by the name John calls himself. Never does Frank Lindh call his
son Hamza.

Hamza spends a lot of time in the hole, according to two Muslims recently
released from Victorville. He doesn't even have to do anything. Other
people do it, and Hamza goes into the hole. Other Muslims do it, and Hamza
goes into the hole. Whenever there's a big terrorist attack and Muslims
take the blame, there goes Hamza for his own protection. He went to the
hole after Madrid, and he went to the hole after London. He went because
he was the most visible Muslim in the prison, and therefore
representative. The prison didn't want him to be the object of
anti-Islamic anger. It did not want Hamza to provoke violence just by
being quiet, gentle Hamza.

He was always a Muslim, his father says. He was born a Muslim on February
9, 1981—already still, already centered, already disciplined. The Men at
Work album was popular at the time, and his father and his mother and his
older brother used to sing one of the songs to him: Boy, you sure are a
funny kid, Johnny, but I like you. So tell me what kind of boy are you,
John?

It's one of the things Frank Lindh has a hard time getting people to
believe, even from the podium—that his son became a Muslim not because of
what went wrong in his childhood but because of what went right. What kind
of boy was John? He was a rare boy indeed—a boy who consolidated all his
frailties into a fantastic tensile strength and used all his stumbling to
find exactly what he was looking for. He was a boy who loved music and
language but was immediately skeptical of Santa Claus. He was a boy who
went to Catholic church with Frank but who couldn't accept the Trinity. He
was a boy who loved his family but didn't have a lot of friends. He was a
boy who was physically robust but also suffered terribly from allergies.
When he was ten years old, his family moved from a suburb of Washington,
D. C., to San Anselmo, outside San Francisco, and he got sick. He had
chronic diarrhea. It was caused by a parasite, but it was thought to be
psychosomatic, and he wound up being home-schooled for four years,
developing the habits of the solitary scholar. Not particularly
comfortable in his own skin, he sought to transcend it, and after he saw
Spike Lee's Malcolm X with his mother when he was twelve years old, he
followed Malcolm's own course from militancy to Islamic submission in
accelerated fashion. In his early adolescence, he presented himself as a
militant black rapper on hip-hop message boards, composing epic rhymes
that castigated the rest of "his" race for selling out to the commercial
interests of the white man. At the same time, he studied Islam, and when
he was sixteen, before he could even drive, he showed up at the mosque in
Mill Valley, California, a half hour from his home, and met a devout young
Muslim named Abdullah Nana.

"Most people, when they come to mosque for the first time, have questions,
and ask for reading materials," Abdullah Nana says at a halal restaurant
in downtown San Francisco. "John Walker came in and said, 'I want to be a
Muslim.' He'd already made the decision on his own. He didn't ask any
questions. He didn't have any doubts. He was unique, in my experience."

He converted that day. He took his shahada, right then and there. He
declared, in front of the few brothers assembled at the mosque, that there
is no God but Allah, and Muhammad, peace be upon him, is His Messenger.
Then he went home and took his symbolic shower and left his old—his
young—life behind. He did not tell Frank and Marilyn, though, until one
night Marilyn picked up the phone and a voice she had never heard
before—the voice of an older man—asked for her son. When she asked John
for an explanation, he said that the man was from the mosque and that he,
John Walker Lindh, was now a Muslim. His father and his mother both wound
up taking John back and forth to the mosque nearly every day, and John
found himself with few encumbrances for his new faith. The Koran asked him
to quit the association of infidel friends, but in Abdullah Nana's memory
there were no friends to quit. The Koran asked him to avoid women who were
not devout, but in Abdullah Nana's memory there were no women, no
girlfriends back in San Anselmo. There were only the trips to the mosque
in Mill Valley and then other mosques in San Francisco, and the two- or
three-hour discussions he and Nana and a few other strictly orthodox young
Muslims would have after Friday prayers, sitting bearded and robed and
shoeless in a circle on the mosque's carpeted floor.

"He was an example to other Muslims," Nana says. "He was very pious, very
dedicated. Within six or seven months, he was wearing full Muslim dress.
And after a year and a half, he decided to leave the country. His first
objective was to memorize the Koran. The fact that John accepted Islam and
within a year and a half had left his country for study in a Third World
country—this could only happen with a person who had dedication,
discipline, and commitment."

Abdullah Nana and the teenager he still calls John Walker often spoke of
going abroad to study Arabic and Islamic law. John went first. Abdullah
went a year later, and now, at twenty-seven, he's the co-imam of the Mill
Valley mosque. He's married, and in public his wife covers her face
completely. He wears a long white robe and a white flat-topped headdress.
His face is curtained by a thick black beard, and he speaks in a soft
monotone that is occasionally inaudible. He does not listen to any music
with a beat, because "music with a beat is not permissible— it causes
hypocrisy of the heart." He eats without a fork, with his right hand,
because that is how the Prophet, peace be upon him, is said to have eaten.
He tries to sleep as the Prophet is said to have slept, and to deal with
his relatives as the Prophet dealt with his relatives. When he speaks of
his own conversion to a devout and orthodox brand of Islam, he recalls his
years attending Cal-Berkeley, where, he says, "it does bother you a
little, to see too much freedom." He offers, in short, a glimpse of the
kind of Muslim John Walker would be if John Walker had gone abroad,
completed his studies, and come home to Marin County. Of course, John
Walker never did come home. Although Abdullah's devotion nearly matched
John Walker's, he wound up following the course of study most Muslims from
secularized countries follow—that is, he chose to study in another
relatively secularized country. He studied in South Africa. John Walker,
on the other hand, chose to study in a country untouched by modernism,
much less secularism. He chose to study in Yemen, where men wear daggers
and carry guns and chew khat all day. Now he is in Victorville, and what
he has in common with Abdullah Nana is . . . well, almost everything,
because they have both offered their freedom to God, and while Abdullah
continually checks the time to make sure he's not missing his obligatory
prayers, John Walker is doing the same thing four hundred miles away, an
anchorite in a desert prison.

Each day, just before dawn, Hamza wakes up to pray in a world of men. It
is not easy to wake up in a prison before the wake-up call, but as an
inmate and a Muslim there are two clocks he has to obey. There is the
clock set by the prison and the clock set by the Creator, all praise be
upon Him, when He bid the earth to move in its wobbly cycles around the
sun. And so Hamza gets out his prayer mat and bends toward Mecca in the
dark at the time prescribed on the downloaded prayer schedule posted in
the prison chapel. As a free man, he made himself a prisoner of God's
will. Now this imprisonment is his only freedom. It is all one, to the one
God.

He never misses the predawn prayer. He is known for not missing the
predawn prayer, for even the most devout sleep past the prayer
occasionally. But not Hamza, because Hamza is waliyy. There are about
fifty Muslims at Victorville, and they all know Hamza is a beautiful
brother. His cellie is a Muslim, an older white man. His closest friend is
a Muslim, a slim, bespectacled black man who—according to former
inmates—killed another soldier while in the military. Hamza doesn't have
many friends, though, for he is in for the long haul and doesn't want
anyone to suffer from their association with him. He also doesn't watch
TV, or play cards, or play basketball, or talk about politics. He just
prays with the other Muslims. He studies with the other Muslims. And he
eats with them—for they all eat together, away, by choice, from the other
inmates—when he is not fasting. He fasts twice a week, Monday and
Thursday, from sunup to sundown. Like all his brothers, he feasts at the
end of Ramadan.

At seven o'clock in the morning he goes to work in the library. It is not
a job that most other inmates want, but it suits Hamza, because all Hamza
does is read and study. He reads and studies so much that people have to
stop him from reading and studying, and sometimes his only respite comes
when the brother who makes the prayer call comes for him and brings him to
the chap- el. He cannot speak Arabic, he cannot pray in Arabic, but he can
read Arabic. He can read the Koran and he can read, in his father's words,
"five-hundred-year-old Arabic texts," and they are his sustenance,
although according to Shakeel Syed, "he has lost some of his spoken
fluency." Still: Arabia, pronounced Ar-a-bee-uh. That's what the brothers
call Arabic, their slang for the divine language. As in: "Hamza? No, you
can't do nothing to Hamza. Nothing fazes him. He just sits there reading
that Arabia...."

His diet is what's called common fare, which is the institutional attempt
to accommodate all prisoners with dietary restrictions. Hamza is a good
cook, though, and often he and some of the brothers skip the meat and make
their own meals with the common-fare vegetables and sardines they buy at
the commissary. After dinner, there is time to relax, although for Hamza
relaxation often means listening to Islamic audiotapes and watching
Islamic videos. Ten o'clock is the count, when every prisoner must be in
his cell before the doors close. And then, slowly, there is the sound of
surrender, the sound of men drop- ping off to sleep, even Hamza, until
midnight. That's when he wakes up for his last prayer, an optional prayer,
a prayer that God does not require but is delighted to receive. The prayer
is called the tahajjud. It is a prayer through which the Muslim speaks to
God most intimately. A sleeping man must wake himself up, and Hamza wakes
himself up. And now, when he is obliged to show his deepest heart to God,
the one thing his Muslim brothers can't imagine him doing is asking God
how he might have lived his life differently.

Whatever sympathy there was for Lindh was based on the idea that he was an
idealist, and therefore a fool. That he took a wrong turn. That he was a
starry-eyed kid, in over his head. That he was looking for his Muslim
merit badge. That he stumbled and bumbled his way into Afghanistan. The
problem with this idea is that it sells John Walker Lindh short. It
doesn't give him credit for his sense of purpose or his vast reserves of
will. It doesn't give him credit for what it took to get to Afghanistan,
much less what it took for him to get back to America.

David Fechheimer knows what it took for John to get to Afghanistan. So
does Barry Simon. They were the investigators hired by James Brosnahan and
his law firm after Brosnahan took up John Lindh's case. They were hired to
trace his every step from February 2000, when he left for his second trip
to Yemen, to December 1, 2001, when the remnants of the routed Taliban
climbed out of the basement at an Afghan fortress and there he was,
famously bearded, famously filthy, famously Muslim, famously American,
famously white. Not long after he came home—or, rather, back to
America—Fechheimer and Simon met him in his cell in Alexandria, Virginia,
where he was awaiting trial. They met with him for a total of about eight
hours, and for a very specific purpose: "to get enough information to put
together a defense," says Fechheimer. "So there wasn't a lot of small
talk. We had to know where he had been and who he had talked to, and he
was the only person who could tell us."

They did not get to know him in their time with him—but then, he was not
the kind of person you got to know. He was, rather, unlike any person
they'd ever met, a throwback, Fechheimer says, "to those Victorian
explorers" who had to go native in order to feel authentic. He was, like
Lawrence of Arabia, willing to suffer almost any kind of deprivation, if
deprivation was what it took to erase the distinction between himself and
his hosts; he was, like Simone Weil, so spiritually ambitious that he was
willing to starve himself into sainthood. "He had terrible eyesight, and
he was frail physically, but he was tough as nails. He told me that during
the last year of his travels, he spent $200, and he was deeply embarrassed
at having spent that much."

When Fechheimer and Simon traveled through John Lindh's world in the
spring and summer of 2002, they also found out this about him: "He had,"
says Fechheimer, "almost photographic recall. He was an absolutely
reliable narrator. We were on the moon, man, but you could find these
places he talked about by following his directions to the letter. He would
say, 'Go west an hour and a half, then look for a large rock. If there's a
red mark on it, take a right and then look up and you'll see a small
valley....' Well, if you did that, a small valley is exactly what you'd
see. We actually found the foxhole he'd been in on September 11, and
that's how we found it." And as John's directions guided the two
investigators, they came to discover the principle that guided John: "He
was extremely hard on himself. If we ever came to a fork in the road and
didn't know which fork to take, we'd say, Okay, let's take the hardest
one. Let's take the one that looks impossible—because that's the one he'd
take. And it always was."

And so they followed his path to Yemen, where he was displeased with the
first language school he attended because, in Simon's words, "there were
young girls from Texas smoking hash at night with bare sleeves" and where,
ultimately, he went to three different schools, each one more
fundamentalist than the last. They followed him to Pakistan, where he
found a contact from a group called Tablighi Jama'at—a Muslim missionary
group that preaches a fundamentalist brand of Islam to other Muslims—and
rode for days on the back of a motorcycle looking for the right madrassa.
They followed him to the city of Bannu, where he lived in the tiny,
dirt-floored back room of a madrassa and where they found some of the
possessions he left behind—notebooks filled with Arabic exercises,
underwear, and an Adidas tracksuit. They followed him to the old smuggling
town of Peshawar, where in May 2001 he showed up at a recruiting center
for the Harakat ul Mujahideen, which in 1997 had been designated a
terrorist organization by the Clinton administration. They followed him to
the military training camp of the HUM, where he was displeased to find
prosperous Saudi boys looking to jihad as a way to lose weight. Then they
did what he had done at the end of June and crossed into Afghanistan.
Using his directions, they found the site of Al Farooq, the training camp
funded by Osama bin Laden, where John Lindh, in the words of his
sentencing memorandum, "voluntarily swore allegiance to jihad" and trained
to serve the Taliban in its civil war against the Northern Alliance. And
then they found his foxhole. It was in a place called Takhar, and "if we
had seen a sign that says the world ends in five miles, we wouldn't have
been surprised," Fechheimer says. "All the men are like five foot two. We
met thirty-four-year-old men who had white beards. And if the people are
smaller, so are the animals. There were all these...tiny donkeys."

It was far away from Marin County, far away from America. Indeed, it had
nothing to do with America, which, as far as Fech¬heimer and Simon could
see, was why John Lindh went there. He wasn't interested in being an
American in Afghanistan; he was looking to lose his American identity
among Arabs and Afghans—and Chechens and Uz¬beks and Muslims from all over
the world—in the most extreme landscape imaginable. "He wasn't a poster
boy for the Taliban," Fech¬heimer says. "He didn't receive special
treat¬ment, and he didn't want any." It was only the global shock of 9/11
that brought Amer¬ica and Americans to this place of tiny men and tiny
donkeys, and, as Fechheimer says, "if George W. Bush couldn't see 9/11
coming, how the hell could Johnny Walker?"

The same conclusion was reached by Rohan Gunaratna, who was hired by James
Brosnahan to interview John Walker Lindh and write a report to the court
before his sentenc¬ing. Gunaratna had made a career of interviewing
terrorists and writing about terrorism and had served as an expert witness
both for and against the government. He spoke to John Lindh for eight
hours and decided emphatically that he was not a terrorist. "He had no
intention of killing civilians," Gunaratna says. "He was not Al Qaeda. At
Al Farooq, there was military training for soldiers in the Taliban and
very specialized training for Al Qaeda. He trained as a soldier. He wore a
Taliban uniform. It has become common to speak of Al Qaeda and the Taliban
as if they are the same thing, but they are not. In fact, he was asked by
[Al Qaeda lieutenant] Abu Mohammad al-Masri if he wanted to go to the
United States or Israel as a martyr. John answered that he came to
Afghanistan to serve on the front lines against the Northern Alliance.
It's very difficult to refuse in a place like Al Farooq. But he refused."

And yet: Shouldn't the nature of al-Masri's invitation have informed him
that he might be fighting for the wrong side? Wasn't the spring and summer
of 2001 a decisive time, when the Taliban set itself on an increasingly
confrontational course with the West? Even if John Walker Lindh had no
access to the Internet or anything like modern communications when he was
training in Al Farooq and soldiering on the front lines in Takhar, he went
to Internet cafés when he was in Bannu, and surely he knew what course the
Taliban was taking. Surely he was aware that on March 9, 2001, the Taliban
had destroyed the towering twin fifteen-hundred-year-old Buddhas carved
into the side of sandstone cliffs in northern Afghanistan, in an
emblematic bit of icon smashing that indicated a new kind of evil was
afoot and presaged so much grief to come.... "Yes, he was aware,"
Gunaratna says. "But he was a young man. People make mistakes when they
are young. He didn't think it was the worst thing. For him, the
destruction of the Buddhas was like Lenin's statue coming down at the end
of the cold war. He was very ideologically driven. He was radicalized. The
process of radicalization had begun when he was in Yemen. He went to the
Taliban because he had been radicalized."

There were no Taliban left when Fechheimer and Simon retraced John's steps
in Afghanistan. At least, they couldn't find anyone who admitted he
belonged to the Taliban, although they did see plenty of people driving
the Taliban's trademark black Toyota pickups. And they did meet plenty of
people who knew or knew of John Walker Lindh. "He was kind of a mythical
character," Simon says, "because his single-mindedness outdid theirs."

America still doesn't know how many radicalized Muslims made their way
here. But as far as radicalized white Americans making their way over
there: John Walker Lindh was the only one.

About three months after Hamza was incarcerated at Victorville in February
2003, he was jumped outside the chapel by a white inmate reputed to have
ties to the Aryan Nation. According to a former Muslim inmate named Abdul
Rahim, the attack came not because of Hamza's history but because of his
fraternization with the brothers, in both senses of the word—the Muslims
and the African-Americans. "They just couldn't stand the fact he was in
that religion with blacks and Hispanics and Arabs. Now he's surrounded by
Muslims. They got Muslims now coming from the penitentiary, and they'll
kill you if you transgress a brother."

Still, Hamza is careful. The greatest fear of his father and mother is
simply that he will be killed in prison, and it is probably Hamza's, too.
He doesn't go where there is a lack of supervision. He doesn't play
sports, and he doesn't spend a lot of time out on the yard, except on
Fridays, when after Friday prayers some of the brothers find a corner in
the yard and talk about God and nobody dares mess with them or with Hamza.
Well, almost nobody: "A Christian guard—a good, decent man—told me
something one day," says Shakeel Syed. "He said, 'Some of us try to
provoke him once in a while. We try to make him mad.' Then he said, 'We
fail miserably.'

"It is what everybody who comes into contact with Hamza eventually
concludes: that there is something inviolate at the heart of his being,
maybe because he has found a peace beyond understanding, or maybe simply
because he has already been violated. By the terms of his gag order, he is
not allowed to speak publicly of what happened to him in Afghanistan and
in American hands after the surrender of the Taliban, but Hamza never
talks about it with anyone, not even his father or Shakeel Syed. And so
his father, when he visits Victorville and watches his son walking across
the visiting room, sees the body language of a man holding in tremendous
grief, and Syed says, "I would often question myself: What can I teach to
this man who has gone through experiences no man should go through, who
has endured such hardships and tribulations? What can I possibly impart?"

"They who believe, and who fly their country, and fight in the cause of
God may hope for God's mercy," says the second Sura of the Holy Koran.

Why did such a gentle soul as John Walker wind up carrying a gun for any
army, much less the army of the Taliban? It is simple: John Walker
believed. Therefore he was obliged to fight in the cause of God. And
therefore he received God's mercy.

Of course, it is easy to doubt. It is easy to join in the chest-beating
rhetoric of America's right-wing commentators, who every time they mention
John Walker seem compelled to observe the convention of calling him a
"punk" and a "coward." But he was neither punk nor coward. He was Al
Ansar. He was a helper. He was where he wanted to be—at the front lines in
the war between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance. He was in a
foxhole. The front was static, and he spent his time reading the Koran.
Then the American planes came and the front broke and the Northern
Alliance began the rout. There was a desperate retreat, in the form of a
fifty-mile march on foot from Takhar to Kunduz. There was no food and no
sleep and hardly any water, and in the panicked darkness scores of Taliban
soldiers were killed by friendly fire. The Taliban's commanders negotiated
a mass surrender with Northern Alliance warlord Rashid Dostum. The men
were transported to the city of Mazar-i-Sharif. Many of the foreign
fighters who made up Al Ansar were herded into a basement at Qala-i-Jangi,
an old mud-brick, star-shaped castle several miles in circumference.
Hundreds of men were in the pitch-dark basement, praying, shining
flashlights in one another's faces, trying to sleep standing up. John
Walker was among them, standing in a corner where men shit and pissed. So
was Yaser Hamdi, the Saudi who was the other American citizen. They had
met each other after the retreat, and Hamdi initially had no idea John
Walker was an American because he spoke nothing but Arabic, and besides,
there were no Americans in Afghanistan.

There were, though. The Americans had come, and the next morning—November
25, 2001—when the men in the basement were brought one by one into the
courtyard at Qala-i-Jangi, two American men were standing with Dostum's
soldiers. The men from the basement were bound by their arms and forced to
kneel while the Americans looked them over and asked them questions and
Dostum's soldiers translated and hit them with rifles. Then John Walker
was hit in the head with a rifle, and the Americans saw him and took him
aside. They did not know that he was American, and John Walker did not
tell them. John Walker, cross-legged and bound, did not say a word. They
did not threaten him exactly, but they said that if he did not speak, he
would be left to Dostum and he would die there at Qala-i-Jangi. Then one
of the men John Walker shared the basement with the night before blew up a
grenade he hid under his coat and the uprising at Qala-i-Jangi began. The
American who was trying to get John Walker Lindh to talk was a CIA agent
named Johnny Micheal Spann. He was shot in the head, and he was a historic
figure just like John Walker, for he was the first American killed in
America's war on terrorism. John Walker was shot in the leg, and he played
dead for twelve hours while the shooting continued and bodies piled up on
both sides. Yaser Hamdi just ran and went back down to the basement.
Finally dark came and someone came out of the basement and dragged John
Walker back in. And then John Walker and Yaser Hamdi and several hundred
men stayed in the basement for six days while Rashid Dostum, with the
backing of American bombers, tried to get them out.

Six days: The American bomb came first, but the American bomb missed. Then
came the grenades tossed down the air shafts. Then came the diesel fuel,
poured in and then lit on fire. And then the freezing water pumped in from
an irrigation ditch. They were blown up and then burned and then drowned
in the dark. Men were dying continually, men were howling in pain and
hunger, men were going mad. John Walker had a bullet in his leg, and he
was also wounded from shrapnel, and he was sick from drinking the water
fouled with the excrement of several hundred men and the effluvia of the
sick and the dying. Yaser Hamdi, like all the rest, couldn't sleep and had
to keep standing because at the end, to sleep meant to slip away in the
water. And still for six days they held out and only began to surrender
because they faced the choice of surrendering to Dostum or surrendering to
the water, and John Walker is said to have reminded the others that
suicide was strictly prohibited by the Holy Koran.

And so you see—God is merciful, wise. You might say He was not there in
such hell, but Yaser Hamdi was in the basement with John Walker, and this
is what he says, in a phone interview from Saudi Arabia: "It was
twenty-four hours asking our God, Allah, for any help. Men crying out to
him. Men who were wounded, men who were sick, men who were dying: The
Koran tells you how to pray in all situations. People there who couldn't
move and couldn't turn to face Mecca still prayed. They prayed in one
position until they died.

"We really had a strong belief and a strong faith in Allah, and we were
praying to him all the time, and we knew what we were going through was
something Muhammad, peace be upon him, and his companions would go through
with patience. We were praying for patience. But it was hard. Really,
really hard.

You cannot imagine. This guy was killed, that guy was killed, and you saw
your friends die right in front of your eyes. When they put in the water,
people started sinking, and when we walked, we walked on top of them.
Bombs, bullets, fire, and thirsty people yelling, 'We want to drink the
water.'

"What happened then was that some people lost their minds, and also people
were injured really badly and they couldn't stand up in the water anymore,
and they just threw themselves into it. They are not killing themselves,
because they are Muslims, but they just can't handle it anymore, and we
try to help them, and maybe John Walker did, too.

"When John Walker was in the basement, he was in a bad situation. He was
injured and the situation was really bad, and Mr. John said, 'I want to
surrender. I can't be patient more than that.' It was impossible for him
to be patient any further. We're Arabs and we can be patient but John
Walker couldn't be patient any further. I said, 'You be patient. If we
surrender, we surrender all; if we die, we die all.' And after that he
moved and he walked in front of my eyes, and after that I did not see him
at all. But he was not the first to surrender. Some of the guys in the
basement who lost their minds were the first to surrender. And after that
some Pakistani people. And after that John Walker came. He was not saying
to anybody, 'Let's surrender.' He surrendered by himself, and that's it.

"In our life, in our world, there is no story like this. When we all
surrendered, we said, 'This is a miracle.' Four hundred people were in the
basement. Seventy survived. Three hundred thirty people died.

"Believe me, the most important thing in John Walker's life is what
happened in this castle."

Hamdi's numbers are not exact. The count is closer to this: 330 men went
into the basement on November 25, 2001, and 85 came out on December 1.
Many, including Hamdi, were then sent to Guantلnamo, although once
American officials realized that Hamdi was an American citizen, he was
brought to the United States and put in the brig for two years without
access to counsel, until at last his lawsuit against Donald Rumsfeld went
to the Supreme Court and he was deported back to his family in Saudi
Arabia. And John Walker went back to America with every reason to turn
away from God.

Instead, he became Hamza.

It is agonizing for him, not to be able to share what he knows. When a
person knows as much as Hamza does, it is human nature to want to share
it, but in Islam the desire goes much further. It is an obligation. God
has given him his knowledge for a reason, and the reason is the further
glory of God. Oh, sure, sometimes he is asked to weigh in on disputes, for
he is known for his wise counsel. And sometimes he offers a correction, if
one of the brothers mispronounces his Arabia. And sometimes he'll turn his
back to a guard and say what he has to say in Arabic, quickly, as if he
has turned away to cover a cough. Most of the time, though, he keeps it
in, both the weight of his knowledge and the weight of experience that was
necessary to get it.

Prisons actively discourage inmates from assuming leadership roles,
because they are in the business of actively discouraging inmates from
assuming power. And that goes double for Muslims, the Muslims say. And yet
people come to Hamza. They watch him, they study his example, the way he
talks, the way he walks. And they show up for Friday prayers to find out
what Hamza—and by extension Islam—is all about. He even converts the
converts. "You'll see someone who's been playing basketball too much, and
he'll be sitting in his cell reading the Koran," Abdul Rahim says. "And
you'll say, Hey, man, aren't you playing ball? And he'll say, No, man, I'm
fixing to be like Hamza."

Christianity seeks to remake human nature, and its great ambition is its
great fault. It is unambiguous in its prohibition of violence for any
purpose, including self-defense, and so it makes hypocrites of its
warriors. Islam's great advantage is that it seeks only to govern human
nature as it is, and so it doesn't ask its warriors to be conflicted about
conflict, as long as conflicts are conducted according to the principles
of the Koran.

And so Hamza is an unconflicted soul. Jihad is the obligation of every
Muslim, and Hamza met his obligation. Martyrdom is the goal of every
Muslim, but Hamza wrote later in an essay to the court that suicide
bombing is against Islam, because the suicide bomber seeks to become a
martyr by his own hand, and martyrdom is only God's gift to grant. Hamza
was not granted martyrdom, but he was granted something
else—righteousness.

The reviled one is the righteous one. And if you don't think so, take a
look at him in the courtyard of Qala-i-Jangi, as he is questioned by
Johnny Micheal Spann. Spann does not identify himself as a CIA agent, and
Hamza does not answer his questions. Indeed, Hamza, with his beard and his
long hair and his air of humble dereliction, looks iconic in a Christian
sense, for the Christian god was well-known for not answering questions
when his life was on the line. And yet he is spared. Who then is the
righteous one? And who is favored by God?

Take another look at Hamza, when he is starved and shot and dehydrated and
sick and sleepless and filthy and sooty, after being taken in a truck from
the basement to an infirmary set up inside an old Afghan prison. It is not
overdramatizing things to say he is close to death, but a CNN reporter
finds out that he's an American and puts him on camera. "If you're
concerned about my welfare, don't film me," Hamza says. The reporter finds
a medic, and the medic gives the prisoner a shot of morphine, but the
camera stays on. Who then is the righteous one? And who is favored by God?

Take another look. Now Hamza is on a plane, being transported to an ad hoc
American base set up outside Kandahar called Camp Rhino. He still has the
bullet in his thigh. He can't walk, but his wrists are bound so tightly
that he begins to scream. He says, "Please don't kill me," and a soldier
tells him to shut up. Later he's duct-taped to a stretcher, naked, and put
in a shipping container. Soldiers are spitting in his food and taking
souvenir pictures of him and his blindfold emblazoned with the word
SHITHEAD. Who is the righteous one? And who is favored by God?

Take another look. He's out of the container now, but he's being
interrogated by an FBI agent at Camp Rhino and still bound and still
wounded. Of course, there are no lawyers there, and the FBI agent has
neither audio nor videotape nor another agent to attest to the propriety
of the proceedings and the accuracy of the statement. And Hamza tells him
everything he knows, for he has nothing to hide. Who is the righteous one?
And who is favored by God?

Now take another look, for he is back home. Take a look as the Justice
Department makes sure he can't speak Arabic, take a look as the Christian
guards make sport of trying to provoke him. . . .It goes on and on. And
here's the thing: It will go on and on. He is Hamza now—Hamza Walker
Lindh—and Hamza will never stop. His righteousness will never stop. In
prison, and then out. "I don't see him going on the speaking circuit when
he goes out," Shakeel Syed says. "But he will be pushed into that. When he
gets out, he will have a married life. He will have a child, because his
faith is so strong and his faith demands it. I see him living in a normal
corner of life and yet bringing about some massive change...."

His father's vision is at once more ambitious and more, well, innocent.
Frank Lindh hopes that when his son gets out, he can serve as an
ambassador between the United States and the Muslim world.

And he will get out. Unless the worst fears of his parents come to pass,
he will get out, either when the Bush administration itself gets out and a
more righteous man is elected, or at his scheduled release in 2019. But he
will get out, and the question is not what he will be like—that we
know—but what we will be like. For Hamza Walker Lindh has come to embody
the challenge of Islam to America, and the challenge is simply this: In
response to what America has done to him, Hamza has become more
Islamic—more himself, and a better Muslim. And in response to what Hamza
has done to it, America has become less properly Christian, and ever less
democratic, and ever so much less than itself. It is a simple, remorseless
calculus, and it will transform the face of the country Hamza is released
into, whenever he is released.

For so it is that Hamza will be free to say what he knows, in the language
of God.

And so it is that Hamza will finally speak, and America will have to hear.

Monday, June 19, 2006

Although admittedly I was only there for the second half, it seems as if the PG Conference was a great success masha'Allah, as per what I gathered from the organisers, the attendees and the many I met and spoke to milling around. May Allah 'azza wa jall reward all the speakers and allow us all to benefit from divine knowledge, ameen.

May Allah especially reward all those brothers and sisters who took out their time to make the event go so smoothly in such a civil and indeed civic manner, organising crowd control, traffic and other potentially delicate issues when so many people converge in what was effectively a residential suburb.

Well done to you all! Oh, and Waqas is working on the BBQ as promised...

;-)

Here are a few pictures from the day given to me by one of the PG brothers:



The calm before the storm (i.e. the break session)...




...and I guess this would be 'the storm' then.




Shaykh Suhayb on the "steadfastness" of Imam Shah Waliullah (r).




Attendees enjoying the stalls.




From left to right, Muft Yusuf Sacha, Shaykh 'Awadallah, Mufti Mohammed and Shaykh Suhayb.




From perfume stalls...




...to promoting healthy eating!




The final session was both informative and thoughtful with excellent nasiha, concluded with du'a by Shaykh 'Awadalla, wal-hamdulillah.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006



The conference organised by the PG brothers this weekend will be addressing a key issue in the revival of our communities to a more Islamic way of life: our character.

If one looks at the early days of Islam, during the golden period of the Sahabah and the Salaf, and then even later throughout our history, we find characteristics, virtues, indeed attributes that were studied, developed, actualised and perfected.

It is these very characteristics, these lost attributes, that more so than ever before need to be rediscovered and actualised in our lives today.

Attributes such as patience, commitment, bravery, honour, generosity, justice, sacrifice, perseverance, strength and much more, were defined by the people who mastered them. What we need to do is to study these people and how they took these modes of behaviour and gave them their due right; from the Khulafā’ to the A’immah, from the A‘lām to the Nubalā’, from ‘Umar b. al-Khattāb to ‘Umar b. ‘Abd al-‘Azīz, from ibn al-Mubārak to al-Bukhāri, from ‘Ā’isha to Nafīsah, from Shah Waliullāh to Imām Shāmil, from Junayd to Jilāni. The list is endless.

What they all have in common is that they were all amazing in a general sense yet excelled in particularly characteristics which they will be specifically remembered for.

The PG conference will attempt to present these "lost attributes" and allow us all to see how they were perfected and then give us the keys on how to implement these attributes in our lives. Observe how each speaker illustrates these attributes in their chosen historical character and recognise how much we need to find and revive them again within ourselves.

All the lecturers are ready and prepared, drawing on their varied backgrounds, specialities and experience. The venue has been set up. Families have been catered for. The only thing remaining is whether you wish to actively make that change in yourself to effect change in our societies.

I, as well as my fellow speakers and organisers hope to see you all there.

And with Allah is tawfeeq.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Being Muslim, English, and other dilemmas with the World Cup
By Abu Eesa Niamatullah


Unless you live in a very deep hole in the ground, you might have noticed the start of the “Greatest Show on Earth” – the Football World Cup 2006.

The universal appeal of the beautiful game can be found in its sheer simplicity and its inclusiveness for all people at all times; from the back-street slums to the most stunning stadiums, football provides humanity with the exercise and entertainment that many people often need to keep them going against the rigours of daily life.

And why shouldn’t all of us, including the Muslims entertain ourselves from time to time as the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) advised, “Entertain your hearts, for hearts become blind when they are weary.” (Bukhari)

This naturally covers the playing of football with the increased benefit of keeping fit but also the watching and supporting of teams in competitions as an occasional past-time, particularly special events and indeed as Bukhari narrates that whilst the Prophet (peace be upon him) was watching a show put on by some Abyssinian entertainers and ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expressed some concern, he said, “Leave them in order that the Jews of Madinah know that our religion has space (for this).”

Of course, from an Islamic point of view, even football can be harmful and indeed impermissible when it leads to evil and wrong. Naturally one expects all sensible good Muslims not to waste their precious time obsessed with what are effectively frivolous pursuits in this ephemeral world. Of course, this goes even more so for Muslims today where the entertainment on offer is the norm in which their lives are immersed in 24 hours a day and practising the religion properly is the occasional past-time. This warning is even more emphasised for those who waste large sums of money in supporting clubs, become fanatical over players, display extremes of emotion based upon results, and incredibly but sadly true those who neglect their obligatory and indeed voluntary duties which should be prioritised at all times such as performing the prayers on time, the seeking of knowledge and attending the circles of dhikr etc.

Like everything in life, moderation is the key.

As well as the above, concerns have been raised in particular concerning the rulings of supporting our own team, England, in the World Cup. Is this permissible? What is the ruling on patriotism? Can we support a country which has “so much blood on its hands”? Is it a contradiction of our faith to “support the adventures of a team which have nothing in common with an Islamic way of life”? Can we fly the flag of St. George? Can we wear England shirts?

Although to many readers, particularly non-Muslims, these questions might sound very strange and bigoted almost, what one must understand is as Muslims, we always try and get a divine justification for our actions in this life – this is absolutely fundamental to the practising of our faith, regardless of whether that is in an Islamic country or a secular country such as England. So let us try and address these issues as objectively as possible.

Despite our faith, England is for many of us our country and place of birth; it is the only culture and way of life we recognise and relate to. We largely share the same ‘likes and dislikes’ in that uniquely British way which only one being British can fully understand.

Like every other Englishman minus the warm beer, we also hate that others know how much we earn, we also love cricket, we also don’t want the Euro, we also love tea, we also can’t stand arrogant people, we also pull out the barbecue at any single possible moment of sunshine we get, we also can’t stand people who don’t queue up, we also ‘hate’ the French, we also love our set holidays every year, we get embarrassed too with the brashness of Evangelicals, we also believe that there should be more history taught in schools, we also moan about the NHS as well yet are still proud that it is the greatest health system in the World – fill in the gaps as you wish, but the only real difference between an English non-Muslim and English Muslims like ourselves is that our culture is supervised by the moral framework of our faith.

It is this framework that allows us to support England as our national team, for what they actually represent in terms of sporting achievement and honour, and not the crimes and oppression that are spread by the orders of our Parliament. It is incorrect to claim that to support England is a giving of credence to the mischief and transgression of English foreign policy – one doesn’t necessitate the other, as is well known from the principles of our religion. One of the proofs for this if proof were ever needed is what has been authentically narrated by Imam Ahmad in his Musnad that the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) who had been given asylum in Abyssinia supplicated to Allah to help and aid the then Christian King, the Negus of Abyssinia when it went to war against her enemies.

Their joy at the Negus’s victory doesn’t contradict any Islamic principles. Likewise, being patriotic to ones home country is not blameworthy under Islam as long as it doesn’t lead to a betrayal of ones faith – we should feel comfortable and happy supporting our country in that which is good, brings wealth, stability and happiness to our fellow citizens, neighbours and indeed ourselves! Likewise, it is quite right that these very same citizens should protest, criticise and complain when our country is engaged in those actions which only bring misery, oppression and injustice. Loving our non-Muslim parents doesn’t mean we love their disbelief. Smiling at the shop assistant doesn’t mean we like their hairstyle. Treating a homosexual for a broken leg doesn’t mean we approve of his deviation. It is vital for Muslims to have a deep understanding in these times of heightened emotions and international strife, and not mix issues according to our own ideas and standards in deference to those standards set by Allah and His Messenger.

Moderation again, is the key to stability in our methodology.

It should be noted though, that to support England doesn’t mean we are allowed to promote symbols and offensive ideas to our pristine monotheistic faith – St. George might have been a rather shadowy figure, claimed by many as ‘their martyr’ due to his foreign parentage, upright principles and battle against paganism and oppression but there can be little doubt about the flag or “St. George’s Cross”.

The Muslims, although ‘not minding’ the non-Muslims venerating the Cross as part of their religion, could never possibly promote such a symbol of disbelief and oppression. To do so would be to ignore the significance that Allah ‘azza wa jall and his Messenger (peace be upon him) have given it. The Qur’an confirms, “they did not crucify him (Jesus on the Cross)” and indeed as the Prophet (peace be upon him) confirmed as collected by Bukhari that on the return of Jesus (peace be upon him), one of the first things that he will do is to break the Cross – literally and metaphorically and surely Allah ‘azza wa jall knows best of the reality of that Day.

To argue, as some do, that the Cross on the England flag means nothing to a largely secular nation today and that the population relate to it in a nationalistic sense and not a religious one, although being an interesting opinion, cannot be considered tenable according to the standards of Sharī‘ah.

Why didn’t England choose a rose then as its national symbol? Or indeed the Ka‘bah? Why the Cross? If other people don’t know the reality of the Cross, the Muslims surely do. The Muslims recognise that it is brandished worldwide as the sign of Christianity and the glorification of the “Ultimate Sacrifice”; that apparently God gave his beloved Son to be sacrificed for the sins of mankind on this much celebrated, yet bizarrely at the same time, much mourned Cross. It is no surprise that the more committed Christians from the Catholic and Orthodox Churches such as in Bulgaria, Greece and Russia amongst others truly venerate St. George and anything to do with the Cross. This is a flag with a major religious significance (unlike the Union Jack for example), that is well known to those who care about such matters.

How can a Muslim proudly display such a flag, which is the symbol of the greatest affront to God Almighty that history has ever seen and then later was the symbol of the Christian massacre of innocent civilians during the Crusades in the 12th Century? The people of today might have no idea or care for the realities behind their signs and symbols but which Muslim would feel safe coming to face God under a flag such as that of St. George’s Cross?

In conclusion, we can say that it is permissible and proper to support the National team in a way which is consistent with Islamic morals and ideals. It is not permissible to display or promote the English Flag intentionally, whether via flags, posters, wrist bands and especially England t-shirts and football shirts which have become widespread amongst the ignorant, for which they are excused due to their lack of knowledge but who also should be advised to leave such shirts for more simple, less loaded representations of our country.

As for those thinking of Three Lions, then think again. Replacing the Cross on your shirt with pictures of animals isn’t exactly Islamic progress.

Finally, despite the fact that magicians of Brazil or Argentina seem set to take the Cup again, England fans need not be despondent, for it was the Prophet (peace be upon him) who said after his prized racing camel lost for the first time, “…everything which reaches a high rank in this world, will come back down again.” (Bukhari)

Maybe, just maybe, it is coming home…

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

World cup fever brings with it all kinds of issues. The most pressing one on the minds of everyone seems to be the 'permissibility of supporting a team' for some reason. Anyway, its nice to see that the Eye can start us off on the right foot when it comes to who Blair supports...



Spot on boys.

But there is a need for studying the Shar'i position on 'patriotism' and of flags and the like - it's not something to be dismissed you know, especially since the Muslims have a particular love of flags.

Well, burning them at least...

:-)

PS: you'll love this true news story from a little while back, found in VLS's Eye column:

"Flag burning does not overly concern me,"
flagmaker Robin Ashburner told reporters in
Swansea, "because it's just an expression of
opinion. Flags are emotive, but it's better to
take your feelings out on one than indulge in
violence. When those cartoons about the
Prophet Muhammad appeared in a Danish
newspaper, orders for our Danish national red-
and-white flag began flooding in. They're still
selling well, but our customers should be
warned. Modern flags are made largely of
polyester, and when they burn, they melt. That
means if they are whirled around by a protestor,
his or her fellow protestors could be splashed
by flying pieces of burning material. If it got
into the eye, it could do serious damage, and
we are about to issue a warning to this effect on
our website."

The owner of the Mr Flag company
continued: "A lot of flag burners make their
own out of strips of cloth. But there is a trend
among shop owners in certain parts of the
world to order in large amounts in advance, to
sell to protestors. Scandinavian flags are now
even more popular with flag burners in Gaza
City, Beirut, and Damascus than the Star of
David or the Stars and Stripes, which used to
be the best sellers over there. Nowadays, we
get almost as many orders from Europe as we
do from the Middle East, so this is very much a
global phenomenon. I even had one call this
week from an American guy who was fed up
with seeing the American flag being burned on
news TV. He wanted me to supply him with the
official Hamas colours, so he could be the first
American to be shown on CNN burning a
Hamas flag. But sadly, I had to turn him down,
because Hamas is still a proscribed terrorist
organisation in the UK." (South Wales Evening
Post, 15/2/06. Spotter: David Hansel)

Honest to God, you just couldn't make it up...

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

This looks interesting...

Islamic Finance and Trade Conference

The main thing missing of course from this title page:

An important two day conference, part held at the Houses of Parliament and the City, to open new doors to Islamic investment in the United Kingdom and to explore opportunities for mutually beneficial trading relationships between the UK and Muslim countries.

Keynote Speakers include:
RT. HON. GORDON BROWN MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
-
HE Prof. Dr. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
The Secretary General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
(See Speakers page for the latest news on participating speakers)
-

The IFTC takes place in London on June 13 / 14 2006.

This international conference is supported by Her Majesty’s Government and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to help enhance trading relationships between the United Kingdom and the Muslim World, and to cultivate an Islamic investment-friendly environment in the United Kingdom.

It is a unique business opportunity for you and your organisation to take part in a historic event and:

- Enhance trading relationships between the United Kingdom and Muslim countries
- Cultivate an Islamic investment-friendly environment in the United Kingdom
- Understand and engage with Muslim businesses and Islamic products
- Network with Government representatives from UK and Muslim countries, financial institutions and business leaders.

Each delegate will receive:
Attendance at full 2-Day conference
Attendance at the House of Commons as part of the conference programme
Attendance at a choice of specific break-out meetings (places limited - allocated on 1st come, 1st served basis)
Networking refreshment breaks morning and afternoon on both days
Lunch both days
Exclusive Reception and Gala Dinner on the evening of Day One
Welcome Pack with conference materials including delegate list
Departure Pack

The Delegate Fee for the 2-Day Conference is £950 (plus VAT).

Tickets are now available online.


... is the small fact that the main keynote speaker is none other than Mufti Saab, Shaykh Taqi al-Usmani (h).

Hmm.

Tempting...what d'ya say ikhwah, are we going down as "Her Majesty's Protectors of the Sacred Ma'ayeer"?

;-)

Sunday, June 04, 2006

There are always appeals for sadaqah in all their different forms and alhamdulillah for that - Imam Sufyan al-Thawri would delight when someone would come to him asking for any kind of charity, for him the easiest and most direct way of gaining reward.

The Indonesian Earthquake Appeal reminds of our duties on the international stage as do indeed countless other projects. It doesn't stop.

Helping Muslims with some particular need such as the Ali al-Timimi Support Campaign is another example. It doesn't stop.

National concerns here in the UK with Da'wah projects, Masajid, Madaris, such as the al-Kawthar appeal or the Masjid al-Tawhid appeal remind us of our local obligations to supporting, promoting, and preserving the religion through knowledge. It doesn't stop.

And may it never stop.

The call for charity will remain for as long as people will use it to get closer to Allah, become His beloved and use the charity as a burhan of our faith - and in these times, there is no other easier way to prove our Islam.

Please support all these and other campaigns that you come across, don't get tired, keep giving as much as you can and keep making du'a that Allah gives you the ability to not turn away those who come to you - remember, Muslims don't do 'charity fatigue.'

Here is a letter from our dear brother Usama Hasan:

Dear friend,

as-salamu 'alaykum.

I am writing to request your help in raising funds for
an important and urgent expansion project for our
mosque, Masjid al-Tawhid in Leyton, east London.

We need to raise a total of £500,000 by the 20th of
June 2006; alhamdulillah, we have raised around
£380,000 already due to the grace of Allah and the
generosity of you and our other brothers and sisters.

We are requesting those families who can afford it to
donate £500 or £1000 or even more; otherwise please
give as much as you can - the important thing is that
Allah accepts and blesses it and purifies our
intentions.

Besides donations, we are also accepting interest-free
loans (qurud hasanah), with a request for a
maximum-possible repayment term. This applies to
individuals as well as other Muslim institutions who
may have some spare cash that they do not need as
urgently as we do.

Details of the project are at the URL below; you can
also donate online by debit or credit card. Please
contribute to this appeal and also forward it on to
family and friends.

Donate here

Masjid al-Tawhid

Thank you very much and may Allah reward you,
was-salam.

Usama Hasan
on behalf of Masjid al-Tawhid, London.

Friday, June 02, 2006

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Talking of scholars, IslamToday has some excellent, short, and well-thought out articles, either by or under the supervision of Shaykh Salman al-'Awdah.

These few here are well worth a read...

"Be ye helpers of Allah"

My Community will divide into 73 Sects

For the Sake of Calling to Islam

Also, I like this little bahth on "The Relationship between Islam & Science"; it's something I wanted to mention myself but if those better than you get there first, then alhamdulillah!

PS please don't forget to bring in your Hospice collections this Friday (8pm!)to the class or get them to me by the weekend somehow as I have to close the whole (painful) episode very soon...

May Allah reward you all for your generosity!

All views and opinions expressed on this website and its attachments do not reflect
the views and opinions of Prophetic Guidance or any of its associates.
free hit counter javascript