As I was driving and heard of the news, all I could think of was how we must have failed again. We still are not learning our lessons. We are still not heeding the warnings. What am I still doing wrong?
That has to be the immediate lesson for all of us right now. What are we still messing up on? Why are we missing the mark? Why are we failing the standard?
And we have to learn and accept the following: if we continue to fall short of the minimum conduct in this life, we can only expect more, and more, and more…
'Aafiyah Ya Allah. Forgive us.
So many things to do, so many things to plan, so many things to get happy at, so many things that sadden us…
Returning to something from the comments in the last post, can I show my solidarity with the miskeen dying brand of '…tolerant Sufi-minded Barelvi form of Islam…' which '…is now deeply out of fashion…'!
Can I reassure all bloggerists that I will be standing side by side with my poor brothers in my planned trip back to the homeland in a few weeks time. It's about time we redressed the balance and brought some nice simple forms of tolerance back to the Frontier…
Donations for our new combined-effort-madressah of tolerance to the normal email address. Shukran.
:-)
I'm enjoying writing every few days you know. Only problem though is that three days in 2005 is like 100 relevant news stories, 6000 questions and only Allah knows what else! Having to filter all that and controlling your thoughts is honestly the most difficult thing to do. As one of the wise ones said:
"Sorry, didn't have the time to be brief…"
Anyway, for the Hanbali fiqh class, considering that we’re doing the chapter of Hudood at the moment, check out this article by Tariq Ramadan.
We must not accept this repression
This article has caused a lot of controversy as is to be expected from Mr Ramadan, a really talented man with a high degree of academic achievement. It's just such a shame that he is wasted with his totally modernist bias; a product one feels of his culturing in the halls of European colonialism.
Saying that, I do think he's on the 'safe' side of an incredibly thin line. I've read this article a few times and I'll need to be pushed further to find a statement which proves that he denies outright the application of hudood in the Shari'ah
He has quite a few valid points in that Hudood are hardly ever implemented. That's a Shar'i precept in the Deen, whether or not it is a kalimatul haqq wa yuridu bihi batil.
It is also agreed that we find many cases are indeed cases of oppression against the weak and poor, "…the application of the sharia today is used by repressive powers to abuse women, the poor and political opponents within a quasi-legal vacuum." And how many cases are we aware of where the rich and politically powerful get away with murder – often literally.
Finally, it is also unfortunately and rather sadly true that many Muslims do indeed believe that, "…that devotion to Islam requires a strict and visible display of punishment, partly an opposition to "the west"..."
This somewhat endemic attitude has been a characteristic found in Muslims from the very early days until the very present day. Our Deen is very much based upon the concept of Rahmah. Mercy emanates every single aspect of our Shari'ah; it's worship as well as it's penal system.
We don't bay for blood but we beg for tawbah and pardon. We don't want to see the weak and guilty hauled in front of thousands, rather we want people to be bigger and take the higher road of forgiveness. One can see this very clearly from the personal conduct of the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) in every single case of someone bringing a case to him. Every SINGLE incident. Bar none.
It was only when the public were made aware, when the state had been informed in a formal fashion did we then see the Hudood being enacted out. This is what our scholars have taught us and left with us a legacy of the compassion of the Prophet, a Mercy to all the Universe.
Anyway enough of my own rambling, going back to the article, this does not justify the very strange and weak methodology adopted by Mr Ramadan, trying to create a marriage between our classical tradition and his Western detractors. His article rather betrays his modernist tendencies, which I wish he'd just come out and admit instead of trying to hide between the (semi-respectable) Ikhwan movement.
Ramadan is really pushing it - he misuses the temporary suspension during 'Umar's Khilafah in the hadd for stealing, and also confuses the call for political reform and justice, and a renewed vigour that he displays in trying to reintepret textual sources on the Hudood.
Man, what is it these days? Hasn't anyone got any good news for once?





